[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-16":3,"comments-16":29},{"id":4,"title":5,"summary":6,"cover":7,"author":8,"tags":12,"viewCount":21,"likeCount":22,"collectCount":18,"commentCount":4,"status":23,"publishedAt":24,"contentMd":25,"contentHtml":26,"likedByMe":27,"collectedByMe":27,"updatedAt":28},16,"微服务还是单体？小团队的架构演进之路","微服务还是单体？小团队的架构演进之路——一篇关于工程实践与性能优化的深度文章。",null,{"id":9,"username":10,"avatar":7,"bio":11},6,"ByteDancer","热爱技术写作的开发者 #3",[13,17],{"id":14,"name":15,"slug":16},1,"性能优化","performance",{"id":18,"name":19,"slug":20},7,"Node.js","nodejs",558,80,"published","2026-09-07T23:56:00.708Z","\n# 微服务还是单体？小团队的架构演进之路\n\n> 这是一篇由种子脚本生成的示例文章，用于演示 DevShare（技享）的排版与数据流。\n\n## 背景\n\n在大型 Web 应用中，**性能** 与 **可维护性** 常常是团队面临的核心挑战。本文将从工程实践出发，分享一套可落地的方案。\n\n## 核心思路\n\n1. 先确定性能指标与验收标准；\n2. 用数据驱动优化，而不是凭感觉；\n3. 关注关键路径，缓存一切可以缓存的内容。\n\n```ts\nconst greeting = (name: string) => `Hello, ${name}!`\nconsole.log(greeting('DevShare'))\n```\n\n## 小结\n\n优化没有银弹，但**持续度量 + 渐进改进** 永远是正确的方向。欢迎在评论区交流你的实践。\n","\u003Ch1>微服务还是单体？小团队的架构演进之路\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>这是一篇由种子脚本生成的示例文章。\u003C\u002Fp>",false,"2026-10-09T16:00:00.026Z",{"items":30,"nextCursor":7},[31],{"id":4,"articleId":4,"author":32,"content":36,"parentId":7,"replyCount":37,"createdAt":38},{"id":33,"username":34,"avatar":7,"bio":35},5,"TypeScriptFan","热爱技术写作的开发者 #5","写得很棒！关于「微服务还是单体？小团队的架构演进之路」的实践有更多细节可以分享吗？",0,"2026-09-10T05:56:00.876Z"]